Kepemimpinan Inovatif Di Perguruan Tinggi: Membangun Kampus Yang Adaptif Dan Responsif
Main Article Content
Robertus Pecamuya
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh budaya organisasi terhadap kinerja dosen dan mahasiswa di perguruan tinggi swasta di Merauke. Dengan pendekatan kualitatif dan desain studi kasus, penelitian ini mengungkapkan tantangan spesifik yang dihadapi oleh perguruan tinggi di daerah tersebut dan memberikan rekomendasi strategis untuk peningkatan kualitas pendidikan. Subjek penelitian terdiri dari dosen, mahasiswa, dan pimpinan perguruan tinggi yang dipilih melalui teknik purposive sampling. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi partisipatif, dan dokumentasi, yang kemudian dianalisis dengan analisis tematik untuk mengidentifikasi tema-tema utama yang berkaitan dengan budaya organisasi dan kinerja akademik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa budaya organisasi di perguruan tinggi swasta di Merauke memiliki pengaruh signifikan terhadap kinerja akademik, baik dalam aspek pengajaran maupun motivasi mahasiswa. Budaya yang fleksibel dan informal di perguruan tinggi swasta memungkinkan hubungan yang lebih dekat antara dosen, mahasiswa, dan manajemen, namun juga menimbulkan tantangan seperti komunikasi yang kurang optimal dan kurangnya struktur dalam pengembangan profesionalisme dosen serta keterlibatan mahasiswa dalam kegiatan akademik. Penelitian ini menyarankan pentingnya pengembangan budaya organisasi yang lebih terbuka, inklusif, dan mendukung kolaborasi antar civitas akademika untuk meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan dan prestasi akademik mahasiswa. Peningkatan komunikasi, pelatihan dosen, dan kebijakan pengembangan sumber daya manusia diharapkan dapat memperbaiki kualitas pengajaran dan penelitian di perguruan tinggi swasta di Merauke.
Adelekan, Odunayo Adewunmi, Bamidele Segun Ilugbusi, Olawale Adisa, Ogugua Chimezie Obi, Kehinde Feranmi Awonuga, Onyeka Franca Asuzu, and Ndubuisi Leonard Ndubuisi. 2024. “Energy Transition Policies: A Global Review of Shifts towards Renewable Sources.” Engineering Science & Technology Journal 5(2):272–87.
Ashaari, Mohamed Azlan, Karpal Singh Dara Singh, Ghazanfar Ali Abbasi, Azlan Amran, and Francisco J. Liebana-Cabanillas. 2021. “Big Data Analytics Capability for Improved Performance of Higher Education Institutions in the Era of IR 4.0: A Multi-Analytical SEM & ANN Perspective.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 173:121119.
Borah, Dhruba, Khaleel Malik, and Silvia Massini. 2021. “Teaching-Focused University–Industry Collaborations: Determinants and Impact on Graduates’ Employability Competencies.” Research Policy 50(3):104172.
Cobo-Rendón, Rubia, Carola Bruna Jofre, Karla Lobos, Nataly Cisternas San Martin, and Esteban Guzman. 2022. “Return to University Classrooms with Blended Learning: A Possible Post-Pandemic COVID-19 Scenario.” P. 957175 in Frontiers in education. Vol. 7. Frontiers Media SA.
Cortes, Andres Felipe, and Pol Herrmann. 2021. “Strategic Leadership of Innovation: A Framework for Future Research.” International Journal of Management Reviews 23(2):224–43.
Dodman, Stephanie L., Katy Swalwell, Elizabeth K. DeMulder, and Stacia M. Stribling. 2021. “Critical Data-Driven Decision Making: A Conceptual Model of Data Use for Equity.” Teaching and Teacher Education 99:103272.
Grossi, Giuseppe, Paolo Pietro Biancone, Silvana Secinaro, and Valerio Brescia. 2021. “Dialogic Accounting through Popular Reporting and Digital Platforms.” Meditari Accountancy Research 29(7):75–93.
Harvey, Jean‐François, and Ravi S. Kudesia. 2023. “Experimentation in the Face of Ambiguity: How Mindful Leaders Develop Emotional Capabilities for Change in Teams.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 44(4):573–89.
Iqbal, Qaisar, and Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej. 2022. “Sustainable Leadership in Higher Education Institutions: Social Innovation as a Mechanism.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 23(8):1–20.
Kalim, Rukhsana, Noman Arshed, and Waqas Ahmad. 2021. “Aligning the Real Sector Production with Human Development: Exploring Role of Multi-Sector Collaboration.” Social Indicators Research 157(3):955–76.
Lansing, Amy E., Natalie J. Romero, Elizabeth Siantz, Vivianne Silva, Kimberly Center, Danielle Casteel, and Todd Gilmer. 2023. “Building Trust: Leadership Reflections on Community Empowerment and Engagement in a Large Urban Initiative.” BMC Public Health 23(1):1252.
Manu, Alexander. 2022. “Transformational Leadership.” Pp. 67–77 in The Philosophy of Disruption: From Transition to Transformational Change. Emerald Publishing Limited.
Owusu-Agyeman, Yaw. 2021. “Transformational Leadership and Innovation in Higher Education: A Participative Process Approach.” International Journal of Leadership in Education 24(5):694–716.
Roberson, Quinetta, and Jamie L. Perry. 2022. “Inclusive Leadership in Thought and Action: A Thematic Analysis.” Group & Organization Management 47(4):755–78.
Sanchez-Carrillo, J. C., M. A. Cadarso, and M. A. Tobarra. 2021. “Embracing Higher Education Leadership in Sustainability: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Cleaner Production 298:126675.
Teng, Yusi, Jie Zhang, and Ting Sun. 2023. “RETRACTED: Data‐driven Decision‐making Model Based on Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education System of Colleges and Universities.” Expert Systems 40(4):e12820.
Timotheou, Stella, Ourania Miliou, Yiannis Dimitriadis, Sara Villagrá Sobrino, Nikoleta Giannoutsou, Romina Cachia, Alejandra Martínez Monés, and Andri Ioannou. 2023. “Impacts of Digital Technologies on Education and Factors Influencing Schools’ Digital Capacity and Transformation: A Literature Review.” Education and Information Technologies 28(6):6695–6726.
Vaithianathan, V., N. Subbulakshmi, Sampath Boopathi, and M. Mohanraj. 2024. “Integrating Project-Based and Skills-Based Learning for Enhanced Student Engagement and Success: Transforming Higher Education.” Pp. 345–72 in Adaptive Learning Technologies for Higher Education. IGI Global.
Vermeulen, Marjan, Karel Kreijns, and Arnoud T. Evers. 2022. “Transformational Leadership, Leader–Member Exchange and School Learning Climate: Impact on Teachers’ Innovative Behaviour in the Netherlands.” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 50(3):491–510
